E
Evan Marks
Guest
I’ve been playing Yooka Laylee a lot lately. I’ve even skipped Mario up to this point (I’ll go back, I promise!) because my hype for Yooka Laylee has built for nearly three years. So far I love it. Everything about it feels good, and I’ve yet to encounter a bug with the camera. The charm rocks muh sock, and Capital B is a hilarious baddie.
I feel like in my conversations about this game many criticism extend from its comparison to Banjo - as it’s spiritual predecessor. Or worse a comparison to Mario!
On the flip side Zelda has been praised (justly so) for its improvements on the Zelda franchise.
So my question is how much should a game’s context dictate your feelings on a game? Can we ruin games with meticulous coverage? Would Yooka Laylee have been received better if it had been a pleasant surprise like Poi? Does Zelda stand up straighter as a Zelda game? Or would it be better as a new ip?
I feel like in my conversations about this game many criticism extend from its comparison to Banjo - as it’s spiritual predecessor. Or worse a comparison to Mario!
On the flip side Zelda has been praised (justly so) for its improvements on the Zelda franchise.
So my question is how much should a game’s context dictate your feelings on a game? Can we ruin games with meticulous coverage? Would Yooka Laylee have been received better if it had been a pleasant surprise like Poi? Does Zelda stand up straighter as a Zelda game? Or would it be better as a new ip?