6o0 FuCkInG Hz?!?!
A Anttu Konstenius Guest Jun 13, 2017 #2 Yeah TV can do atleast 400Hz that I know but it is just because the TV suspects the next frame so it is not the same as in monitors
Yeah TV can do atleast 400Hz that I know but it is just because the TV suspects the next frame so it is not the same as in monitors
C Chris Dewald Guest Jun 13, 2017 #4 It appears someone made a typo on the Internet. STOP THE PRESSES!
C Calvin DiBartolo Guest Jun 13, 2017 #6 I've heard of 900hz as well. It's probably ultra-heavy processing and trickery (like how some LCD's have flicker reduction backlighting to emulate higher refresh rates) rather than a true refresh rate
I've heard of 900hz as well. It's probably ultra-heavy processing and trickery (like how some LCD's have flicker reduction backlighting to emulate higher refresh rates) rather than a true refresh rate
B Bayram Taha Hatipoğlu Guest Jun 14, 2017 #8 It's not that hertz you thinking, not the screen hertz.
P Phil Harbon Guest Jun 14, 2017 #12 Plasma TV's can run 600hz. This is common knowledge LCD is only just reaching 200hz. People should really read up before commenting!
Plasma TV's can run 600hz. This is common knowledge LCD is only just reaching 200hz. People should really read up before commenting!
T Tomáš Bydžovský Guest Jun 14, 2017 #15 nothing new, smart TVs have been doing motion interpolation for years, but actual input is limited to 60hz anyway
nothing new, smart TVs have been doing motion interpolation for years, but actual input is limited to 60hz anyway
M Melih Çalıcı Guest Jun 14, 2017 #16 So if I get this and get 600FPS on CS:GO, should I use this and get blamed for hacking?
B Balubish J Wiking Guest Jun 14, 2017 #19 Its not the refreshrate as a monitor. Its the sub-field drive.
